← All Indiana markets
Competitive Analysis — Lafayette DMA · YTD

Lafayette Market Competitive Analysis

901 legal advertisers delivered impressions in Lafayette, IN year-to-date, but only Blackburn Romey is buying local broadcast — the rest reach the market through national connected-TV that spills into the DMA. This view measures delivered viewing volume.

Field Impressions
9.0M
detected field · YTD
Advertisers Detected
901
Lafayette · YTD
Streaming Share
46%
9.2M · of full-market delivery
Local Leader
Blackburn Romey
49% local-broadcast share
Competitive Landscape

Who's running — and where

Of the 901+ legal advertisers detected delivering in Lafayette year-to-date, only Blackburn Romey is actually buying Lafayette local broadcast. The others reach the market almost entirely through national connected-TV that spills into the DMA — not local media buys. Share of voice below reflects total delivered volume; the National · CTV tag marks advertisers with no meaningful local-broadcast presence here.

Across Lafayette, IN, 901 legal advertisers were detected delivering impressions in market year-to-date — almost entirely national connected-TV spilling into the DMA. Only Blackburn Romey is buying local broadcast. The 8 advertisers delivering at scale (500K+ impressions YTD) are shown below; the bars contrast the full detected market with that field, by share.

Full Lafayette Market (901 advertisers · 20M impressions) · Share of Delivery
Broadcast 23%
vMVPD 31%
CTV 46%
Broadcast 4.6M · vMVPD 6.1M · CTV 9.2M
Lafayette Detected Field (8 advertisers · 9.0M) · Share of Delivery
Broadcast 32%
vMVPD 37%
CTV 31%
Broadcast 2.9M · vMVPD 3.3M · CTV 2.8M
Broadcast (local stations & cable)
vMVPD (live-TV streaming bundles)
CTV / Streaming (true OTT apps)
Delivered Impressions by Channel (YTD)
#FirmShare of Voice
of competitive set
Total Impressions
delivered · YTD
Channel MixBroadcast %vMVPD %CTV %
Majors
1Blackburn Romey Local36.5%3.3M
61%35%4%
2Morgan & Morgan Injury Law Firm National · CTV29.6%2.7M
28%44%28%
3Hensley Legal Group National · CTV8.8%795K
15%63%22%
4Dimopoulos Injury Law National · CTV8.0%723K
0%13%87%
5Keller & Keller National · CTV5.3%474K
8%51%41%
Mid-Pack
6Gary Massey Injury Lawyers National · CTV5.0%449K
0%9%91%
7The Barnes Firm Injury Attorneys National · CTV4.1%367K
0%14%86%
8King Aminpour Car Accident Lawyer National · CTV2.8%249K
0%9%91%

Share of Voice is each firm's share of the 8-firm competitive set shown here — not the full market.

Publisher Intelligence

Share of voice — who owns what

Share of voice across the competitive set — the 8 firms competing in Lafayette year-to-date, by publisher.

Publisher Volume — Impressions (YTD)
Competitor Share of Voice by Publisher Each firm's share of the competitive set's impressions on that publisher.
Firms: Blackburn RomeyMorgan & MorganHensley Legal GroupDimopoulos Injury LawKeller & KellerGary MasseyThe Barnes FirmKing Aminpour

Ranked competitor detail by publisher

Each card is one publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every competitor in the set with measurable impressions.

XFINITY Streaming
vMVPD
1.9M impressions · 22% of set · 8 of 8 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    700K
    37.3%
  2. 2
    Blackburn Romey
    597K
    31.8%
  3. 3
    Hensley Legal Group
    304K
    16.2%
  4. 4
    Keller & Keller
    139K
    7.4%
  5. 5
    Dimopoulos Injury Law
    56K
    3.0%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    The Barnes Firm
    43K
    2.3%
  2. 7
    Gary Massey
    27K
    1.4%
  3. 8
    King Aminpour
    10K
    0.5%
WLFI
Broadcast
1.5M impressions · 17% of set · 5 of 8 active
  1. 1
    Blackburn Romey
    1.0M
    69.7%
  2. 2
    Morgan & Morgan
    414K
    28.2%
  3. 3
    Hensley Legal Group
    27K
    1.9%
  4. 4
    Keller & Keller
    4K
    0.3%
  5. 5
    King Aminpour
    284
    0.0%
YouTube TV App
vMVPD
968K impressions · 11% of set · 8 of 8 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    356K
    36.8%
  2. 2
    Blackburn Romey
    301K
    31.1%
  3. 3
    Hensley Legal Group
    177K
    18.3%
  4. 4
    Keller & Keller
    90K
    9.3%
  5. 5
    Dimopoulos Injury Law
    25K
    2.6%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Gary Massey
    10K
    1.0%
  2. 7
    King Aminpour
    6K
    0.6%
  3. 8
    The Barnes Firm
    3K
    0.3%
YouTube App
Streaming App
764K impressions · 9% of set · 8 of 8 active
  1. 1
    The Barnes Firm
    192K
    25.2%
  2. 2
    Dimopoulos Injury Law
    170K
    22.3%
  3. 3
    Morgan & Morgan
    152K
    19.9%
  4. 4
    Gary Massey
    122K
    15.9%
  5. 5
    King Aminpour
    60K
    7.9%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Hensley Legal Group
    29K
    3.8%
  2. 7
    Keller & Keller
    26K
    3.4%
  3. 8
    Blackburn Romey
    12K
    1.6%
PlayStation 5
Device
444K impressions · 5% of set · 8 of 8 active
  1. 1
    Dimopoulos Injury Law
    127K
    28.7%
  2. 2
    Morgan & Morgan
    93K
    21.0%
  3. 3
    Gary Massey
    91K
    20.4%
  4. 4
    The Barnes Firm
    57K
    12.9%
  5. 5
    King Aminpour
    54K
    12.2%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Keller & Keller
    16K
    3.6%
  2. 7
    Blackburn Romey
    3K
    0.6%
  3. 8
    Hensley Legal Group
    2K
    0.6%
WNBC
Broadcast
407K impressions · 5% of set · 6 of 8 active
  1. 1
    Blackburn Romey
    237K
    58.2%
  2. 2
    Morgan & Morgan
    78K
    19.2%
  3. 3
    Hensley Legal Group
    62K
    15.3%
  4. 4
    Keller & Keller
    29K
    7.0%
  5. 5
    The Barnes Firm
    682
    0.2%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Dimopoulos Injury Law
    341
    0.1%
XBOX
Device
342K impressions · 4% of set · 8 of 8 active
  1. 1
    Gary Massey
    96K
    28.0%
  2. 2
    Dimopoulos Injury Law
    93K
    27.3%
  3. 3
    Morgan & Morgan
    68K
    19.7%
  4. 4
    King Aminpour
    50K
    14.7%
  5. 5
    The Barnes Firm
    20K
    6.0%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Keller & Keller
    12K
    3.5%
  2. 7
    Blackburn Romey
    1K
    0.4%
  3. 8
    Hensley Legal Group
    1K
    0.4%
Amazon Fire
Device
300K impressions · 3% of set · 8 of 8 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    83K
    27.7%
  2. 2
    Hensley Legal Group
    66K
    21.9%
  3. 3
    Dimopoulos Injury Law
    39K
    13.1%
  4. 4
    Blackburn Romey
    29K
    9.8%
  5. 5
    Gary Massey
    29K
    9.8%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Keller & Keller
    27K
    8.9%
  2. 7
    The Barnes Firm
    17K
    5.8%
  3. 8
    King Aminpour
    9K
    2.8%
Other App
Streaming App
272K impressions · 3% of set · 8 of 8 active
  1. 1
    Morgan & Morgan
    170K
    62.4%
  2. 2
    Dimopoulos Injury Law
    29K
    10.9%
  3. 3
    Gary Massey
    29K
    10.8%
  4. 4
    Blackburn Romey
    16K
    5.9%
  5. 5
    Keller & Keller
    11K
    4.1%
Show all 8 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    King Aminpour
    6K
    2.2%
  2. 7
    Hensley Legal Group
    6K
    2.1%
  3. 8
    The Barnes Firm
    4K
    1.6%
Competitor Creative

The creative landscape

Active spots running in the Lafayette market this period.

BR
We Are Available
Blackburn Romey
Personal Injury
MMIL
Call Now
Morgan & Morgan Injury Law Firm
Personal Injury
HLG
Free Evaluations
Hensley Legal Group
Personal Injury
GMIL
Your Life For The Better
Gary Massey Injury Lawyers
Personal Injury
KK
Free Consultation
Keller & Keller
Personal Injury

Methodology and Definitions

1. Data Sourcing & Collection

Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.

A note on reading this data. These figures are drawn from a representative smart-TV panel, so they are best read as a strong directional indicator of in-market presence rather than an exact census of delivery. Channel mix and share-of-voice percentages are the most reliable view. Impression counts are included for scale, but can vary from market to market and may not perfectly reflect exact delivery splits.

2. Competitive Set & Scope

This report covers the legal advertisers competing for clients in the market — firms based here or in a neighboring state with a genuine local presence. Non-law advertisers, and national campaigns that only spill incidental connected-TV impressions into the market, are excluded so the field reflects real local competition.

For large national advertisers, we judge local presence by their share of local-broadcast delivery — the signal that a firm is actually buying local affiliate inventory, not just airing national connected-TV. A national advertiser such as Morgan & Morgan is included in a market only where a meaningful share of its delivery runs on local broadcast affiliates; where an advertiser delivers almost entirely through national connected-TV with negligible local broadcast, it is set aside as spillover. Share of voice and all channel splits are measured across this set.

3. Channel Categorization

Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.

Broadcast
Local station-originated linear & cable inventory
Local OTA broadcast affiliates (ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX), national broadcast networks, syndicated broadcast, and traditional linear cable + satellite (Xfinity, Spectrum, Cox, Charter, DirecTV dish, Dish Network) — viewed via antenna or linear MVPD carriage.
vMVPD
Streaming delivery of linear feeds
YouTube TV, Hulu Live, Sling, fuboTV, Philo, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, XFINITY Streaming, Spectrum Streaming, Dish Streaming, Uverse Streaming. Streaming delivery, but content includes broadcast-originated station feeds — kept as a separate line for clarity.
CTV / Streaming
True streaming, app-based CTV
Ad-supported streaming apps (Peacock, Pluto, Tubi, Paramount+), peripheral devices (Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, Xbox, PlayStation), FAST channels, and digital video / app-based CTV inventory.

Publisher definitions

4. Key Attribution Information

Why vMVPD is its own line. When a viewer watches a local broadcast affiliate through a streaming bundle (YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, Cox Streaming, Hulu Live, etc.), the delivery is internet-based but the content is broadcast-originated linear. Buyers and sellers treat vMVPD distinctly from both pure broadcast and true OTT — so we report it as a separate line rather than rolling it into either.

Satellite vs. streaming MVPDs. DirecTV satellite dish is reported as Cable. DirecTV Stream (the internet-delivered linear app) is reported as vMVPD.

OTA (Over-the-Air). Free broadcast signals received via antenna from local ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX affiliates. Reported under Broadcast.

A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show single-digit-to-low-teens CTV/Streaming exposure in this view because ACR captures actual viewing across the connected-TV panel — including incidental impressions on Roku, Fire TV, Tubi, Apple TV, Pluto, Peacock, network broadcaster apps, and similar ad-supported streaming platforms. Those carry their own ad inventory distinct from the linear feed (and from vMVPDs), so they're reported under CTV / Streaming.

5. Glossary